Pakistan, the Taliban, and the Bomb - Instablogs
Pakistan, the Taliban, and the Bomb
Michael C , Lyon: Aug 1 2009
Made Popular Aug 1 2009
Pakistan :

Pakistan, the Taliban, and the Bomb

Many people have been asking in recent years if the Taliban or other radical Islamist groups could control Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and, speculation apart, there has been precious little hard information available to help answer them. A new report concludes that it would be almost impossible for Islamists to achieve that aim.

Any attempt to answer the question would be doomed to failure without an understanding of how Pakistan administrates and protects its nuclear weapon stockpile, and that was precisely the objective of a recent study and research programme carried out by the French Institute the ‘Foundation for Strategic Research’ – the FRS in French.

The study examined the scenarios which most worry Western Intelligence Agencies.

Its conclusions are summed up in one simple phrase by Bruno Tertrais, Master in Research at the FRS;

“The Taliban will never be able to wrest control of Pakistan’s nuclear arms by force.”

Pakistan has become more volatile over the last five years. The Taliban’s Swat Valley insurrection and religious extremism have contributed to a deteriorating security situation within Pakistan’s borders. The Taliban and their allies are not hiding their intention of destabilising the country.

The scenario in which the Taliban come down from the mountain to attack nuclear installations is pure science-fiction, but there are others.

Pakistan developed its first nuclear weapon in the 1970’s with for sole objective the protection of the country from any eventual attack by India, which already posessed a nuclear capability..
Research into how best to create a weapon was greatly aided by Abdul Qadeer Khan, a Pakistani employee of Urenco, a European company specialising in the enriching of uranium. He stole the company’s technology and took it back to Pakistan.From there, a little help from the Chinese helped Pakistan to complete it’s research.

Pakistan had the bomb.

Khan was also responsible for Pakistan becoming the principal nuclear proliferator on the planet.

Iran, North Korea and Libya all profited from the technology that he either gave or sold to them.

Pakistan now has just under a hundred nuclear warheads, almost all of which are composed of enriched uranium. Nuclear engineers are actively looking to upgrade the country’s nuclear capability using plutonium.

The man responsible for the security of Pakistan’s nuclear installations and technology is 59 year old Khalid Kidawi. He runs the Pakistani Strategic Planning Department, the SPD.
The United States gave him a credit line of $100 million to help him develop his control systems with their aid. Pakistan didn’t let Americans into sensitive areas though, and that’s why America still has limited knowledge of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

Americans and Pakistanis do agree on one thing however, and that is that the Taliban or any other group would never be able to physically gain control over nuclear weapons and activate them, in any situation.

Not only are the weapons dissimulated on ultra-protected independent and hermetic sites, they are stocked in “kit” form. The motors are stored away from the missiles, and fissile material is kept in a separate area from the warheads.

Any movement of any element must have the agreement of at least two individuals all the way down the command chain.

An additional safeguard consists of the fact that the missile activation procedure, besides following the above procedure for all actions, also has a double coding system which needs command authentication in order that those ordering the bomb’s activation as well as those actually activating it need to verify and authenticate themselves.

But there is also the scenario of technology transfer and leaks, such as what happened with Khan. 70 000 people work in Pakistan’s nuclear sector, including 8000 research engineers, 2000 of which have access to sensitive information.

The CIA has not forgotten the case of Sultan Bashiruddin Mahmoud, a nuclear engineer converted to Radical Islamism and invited to meet Bin Laden and Al-Zawahiri in order to share what he knew. Luckily, he only had access to low-level data.

The result of that episode was that since 2005 Pakistan has implemented a carbon copy of a sophisticated American personnel surveillance programme called the ‘Personal Reliability Program.’ This programme is a combination of intense police and intelligence surveillance and enquiries linked to psychological testing.

Although this programme is not estimated to be fail-proof, Pervez Hoodboy, Physics Department President at Pakistan’s prestigious Qaid-e Azam university, says that “It is not impossible that a plot be organized to help terrorists to build a rudimentary bomb, but there would have to be at least twenty of them in order to obtain all the specific knowledge necessary to build the bomb as well as to procure fissile material for it.”

But the two scenarios which are most worrying intelligence experts are elsewhere.

The first scenario involves a radicalisation process developing within the system itself. The consensus is that an Islamic Revolution is impossible, but chaos and anarchy in Pakistan could destabilise the country to a point where people could view the nuclear issue in another light.

This is why the Pakistani government decided to deal with the Swat Valley rebellion so determinedly. The idea that the Taliban could win the hearts and minds of the people was seen as a threat. The Pakistani and American governments entirely agree on the need to ensure that the Swat Valley experience does not repeat itself.

The second and by far the most worrying scenario does not just involve Pakistan’s internal affairs. It involves India too.

What intelligence agencies fear the most is that another massive wave of terrorist attacks in India and organized inside Pakistan could, in a worst-case scenario, provoke high tensions and even war between India and Pakistan.

This could lead to a situation in which Pakistan relieves the pressure on the Taliban and leaves them free to roam the country to defend it.

This in its turn could result in extremely dangerous circumstances in which the Pakistani Army may need to transfer and prepare several armed and prepared weapons at once, all of this done by people whose frustration with an eventual war’s progress could lead them to consider the Taliban as a means of helping them to attack India.

It is thought that this is the scenario which the United States and other countries fear the most.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Vinod
Shimla, India
Welcome back Michael!
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
Thank you Vinod, it’s a pleasure to be back. Taking a break was the best thing I could have done and here I am, back to posting as usual (apart from some changes in other areas lol!)
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Mayorga
Islamabad, Pakistan
Michael
Pakistan has the capability to protect its nuclear arsenal. Terrorism is a threat every where. There are terrorists in India. Should we believe that state of India can't protect its nuclear weapons? No. Then why do the western countries doubt the Pakistan's capacity?
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
Hello Mayorga, and thanks for commenting. I personally don’t doubt it for an instant and, to be honest, I don’t think many people do.
There is no way that that could happen.
It’s just that the question was (wrongly in my view) asked so it needed an answer.
In fact, one of the reasons I put up the study is that, as you say, it demonstrates that the idea of Pakistan losing control of its nuclear arsenal is is more than highly unlikely.
I couldn’t agree more.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
ARVIND K.PANDEY
PRAYAG, India
Nice to see you back.
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
That’s very kind of you Arvind, thanks.
(Global Perspectives)
2 Stars
ARVIND K.PANDEY
PRAYAG, India
@Mayogra

Well,the logic offered by you is absolutely flawed.You people should get above the habit of equating yourself with India in each and every issue.If India is able to keep it’s nuclear technology beyond the reach of terrorists how the hell it automatically ensures saftey of nuclear weapons in Pakistan ? What sort of logic have you offered ?

Is is the right thing to suggest that the way Ameriacns ensures transparency in the affairs makes India too capable of dealing in same sort of transparency and that too without adequate measures ?

It’s high time Pakistan becomes realistic in anticipating threatening developments in its land rather that trying to hide the failures by pointing accusing fingers at India.
0 Stars
ARVIND K.PANDEY
PRAYAG, India
Is it the right thing to suggest that the way Ameriacns ensures transparency in the affairs makes India too capable of dealing in same sort of transparency and that too without adequate measures ?

It’s high time Pakistan becomes realistic in anticipating threatening developments in its land rather than trying to hide the failures by pointing accusing fingers at India.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Mayorga
Islamabad, Pakistan
Arvind
It's not the question of equating Pakistan with India, it's the question of dual standards that western countries and India have. How can any body think of such things in sovereign country like Pakistan. Militants attacked the twin towers of USA. They are recruiting the American and European people in Al-Qaeda. Should we believe that they are in a position to capture the nuclear arsenals of USA?
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
It is absolutely true that the protection of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal has nothing to do with that of India or anyone else’s arsenal.
The questions began to be asked here in Europe not vis-a-vis India, but when the Taliban’s influence began to creep dangerously close to Islamabad, and the study I wrote about was done in that context.
That said, the Swat Valley offensive seems to have calmed those fears, at least as far as I know.
1 Stars
ARVIND K.PANDEY
PRAYAG, India
@Michael

I hope your understanding becomes the understanding of Pakistanis!Or else,they will never come to realize what’s the right way to deal with crisis!
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
Yes Arvind, you may be right, but to be honest I don’t live in either of your countries so my point of view is maybe less impassioned than those of Indians and Pakistanis, for obvious reasons.
We here are not directly involved in the issue although we do follow it closely.
I just wish the best for all concerned and peace for those on both sides of the divide.
2 Stars
Nuya Bidness
Birmingham, United States
The terrorist would have to figure out exactly who’s eye has to be plucked out for the rental scan part of the equation and who’s hand to chop off for the palm print and then the code which has to be input simultaneously, in 2 different locations. And that is only the beginning! The Personal Reliability Program may be modeled after the one in America, but since it is heavily dependent on individual psychology and interaction by numerous agencies, I doubt it has much resemblance to what it was modeled after.
After all is said and done, let’s hope that both countries can spot a real threat when it presents its self and not jump the gun.
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
Lol!
Cool way of describing the impossibility of the terrorists’ getting hold of the bomb!
You’re right about the test of course Nuya. It must have been adapted to the moral codes and cultural practices in that part of the world, that which would change its nature in one way or another.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
Hello Yogi,
Thanks for stopping by.
I can’t speak for the others, but I can say that the article doesn’t actually try to seek out the reasons for ’the problem’ but just analyse the security of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons.
As for the problems going on over there, that’s another story in my humble opinion.
I don’t really feel I know enough about the events over there compared to those who live there, although it does seem to me that there isn’t just one of those two countries to blame for everything. That would be too easy..:).
Maybe someone has some ideas?
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Inspector
Lokhandwala, India
Its been long Michael but good to see you again...
Pakistan’s collapse is everybody’s problem. As the government of Pakistan totters, we must face a fact that we are worried about nuclear weapons but we should not intend to be fear mongers.

Pakistan will really be a threat if govt. of Pakistan creates a vacuum and Taliban fills it. But given the American strategy for Pakistan, in the real sense America has reached the breeding ponds of terrorism and hopefully it will be destroyed for ever and we will live in the world with no fear.
2 Stars
Sanyog
Chennai, India
That's the point. Pakistan's disintegration can never be in India's favour. I am saying this against the false propaganda created by Pakistani government and Media that India is involved in the disturbances in The Baluchistan.

I am doubtful about the American intentions of eliminating the terrorism from Pakistani soil.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
Hello Rakesh,
...And it’s good to hear from you too.
Yes, the first part of your comment seems to bear out what the study shows.
Concerning the USA, there is so much to put right. Obama is going to have a lot of work correcting Bush’s errors.
I wish him luck. He’s certainly going to need it.....
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Michael C
Lyon, France
Sanyog,
Your’e right.
The disintigration of Pakistan would be catastrophic for India. Not only that, it would be catastrophic for the whole world.
(Global Perspectives)
Add your Comment